13 best Peec AI alternatives in 2026, compared on price, engines and features

Peec AI costs $95 a month for 50 prompts on 3 AI models, and Perplexity is sold as an add-on from $30 a month. Teams usually look elsewhere for one of four reasons: a lower entry price, more prompts per dollar, Claude coverage, or a tool that says what to fix next. Otterly.AI starts at $29, SE Visible gives about 11,250 answers a month for $89, Promptwatch covers Claude at the same $95, and Vizible AI, which publishes this guide, starts at $45 with Perplexity included and a task prepared every day.

Every tool in this list was tested on a paid plan by Louis Foweraker, CEO and founder of Vizible AI. We compared 13 Peec AI alternatives on price, engines, prompt volume, cost per AI answer, what each tool tells you to do next and what its users report. Every price was checked on the vendor's own pricing page on 25 October 2026, with the pages rendered in a browser because several of them load their prices with JavaScript.

Key takeaways

• Best overall for teams that want to act: Vizible AI, from $45 a month ($27 with the launch offer until 30 November 2026), with a daily task and articles included.
• Lowest regular entry price: Otterly.AI at $29 a month, for 15 prompts.
• Most AI answers for the money: SE Visible, about 11,250 answers a month for $89.
• Closest swap if you need Claude: Promptwatch, at the same $95 entry price as Peec AI, with every model on every plan.
• For enterprise procurement: Profound, with SSO, SOC 2 and up to 9 answer engines on a custom plan.

The best Peec AI alternatives at a glance

Each tool in one line: who it suits, the entry price, the trial, the engines and the prompts on the first plan.

What Peec AI includes in 2026

Peec AI, based in Berlin, sells three self-serve plans for brands. Starter costs $95 a month for 50 prompts, 1 project and 1 country, which Peec counts as 4,500 AI answers a month. Pro costs $245 for 150 prompts, 2 projects and 3 countries. Advanced costs $495 for 350 prompts, 5 projects and Looker Studio. Every plan includes unlimited users and daily tracking, and annual billing takes 15% off.

Each plan lets you choose 3 models from ChatGPT, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode and Naver AI. Perplexity is an extra model, from $30 a month billed annually on Starter, $70 on Pro and $140 on Advanced. Claude, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral and Qwen appear only on the custom Enterprise plan, through their APIs.

The product has grown well beyond a dashboard. Peec's feature list now covers visibility, position, sentiment and share of voice against competitors, source and citation analysis, recommended actions, AI bot visits from CDN logs, AI shopping data at product level, brand perception and fact-checking, an MCP server, an API and an AI agent that runs reports and diagnostics. Teams that like Peec usually like it for that depth and for its clean interface.

What users and testers say: Peec AI is rated 4.7 out of 5 from 21 reviews on G2, where users like the setup and the share-of-voice and citation metrics, and find the recommendations weak. Overthink Group scored it 3.2 out of 5, praising unlimited seats on the entry plan and finding that prompts often need relabelling by hand.

Why teams look for a Peec AI alternative

Teams leave Peec AI for four reasons, and each one points to a different alternative.

The first is the entry price. $95 a month is a lot for a founder or a small marketing team that needs 20 well-chosen prompts, not 50. The second is Perplexity. It costs extra on every self-serve plan, although it often behaves very differently from ChatGPT: in Ahrefs' analysis of 15,000 queries, 28.6% of Perplexity's cited URLs ranked in Google's top 10, against about 8% for ChatGPT's in-text citations. A brand can look strong in one engine and absent in the other, as our study of how AI engines rank the same brands differently shows.

The third is Claude. Teams that sell to developers or to technical buyers want Claude in the tracking, and Peec keeps it for Enterprise. The fourth is the gap between data and action. Many teams do not have a GEO specialist, and they want the tool to tell them what to fix tomorrow morning, not only to report a score.

How we chose these alternatives

We kept tools that a team leaving Peec AI could actually buy this month: a public price or a free trial, daily tracking, competitor comparison and source analysis. Then we compared them on six criteria.

• Entry price and what it buys: the cheapest plan, its prompts and its engines.
• Engine coverage: which engines come with the plan, and which ones cost extra.
• Cost per AI answer: the price divided by the AI answers the plan analyses each month, the only way to compare tools that count prompts, credits or checks.
• Next steps: whether the tool turns its data into tasks, content or fixes, or leaves that work to you.
• Fit for a team: seats, projects, countries and integrations.
• What users report: ratings and recurring praise or complaints on review platforms, and the findings of independent hands-on tests.

We use Vizible AI every day, since it is our product. For the twelve others, the facts come from their public pricing pages and documentation as they stood on 25 October 2026, and from what their users and independent testers report: ratings and reviews on G2 and Trustpilot, and hands-on reviews such as Overthink Group's test of seven trackers and Zapier's guide. Each tool section ends with that feedback and its source, and we say so when a figure is our own calculation. For a wider view of the category, see our guide to the tools that track brand mentions in ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity.

1. Vizible AI

Best for: founders, small and mid-sized companies and marketing teams without a GEO specialist, who want to know what to do next and not only where they stand.

Vizible AI (our product) tracks how ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode talk about your brand, every day, against the competitors you choose. You enter your website; it suggests your niche, your competitors and your first prompts, and the first answers arrive within minutes. Each answer is analysed for mentions, position, sentiment and the sources the engine cited, which gives you a visibility score and your share of voice by engine.

What sets it apart is what happens after the measurement. Every day, it prepares one concrete task from your own data: fix a technical problem found on your site, get into a comparison page where your competitors are cited and you are not, or publish an article. Three AEO articles a month are included on the first plan, written from your visibility gaps and published to WordPress, Shopify, Squarespace or Wix in one click. Every month, it also scans 15 key pages of your site with a score made for each page type.

AI traffic from Google Analytics 4, AI crawler log analysis and a read-only MCP connector for Claude and ChatGPT come with every plan, so you can ask an assistant what to fix first.

Pricing: Vizible AI's Starter plan costs $45 (€39) a month for 1 brand, 20 prompts and 3 engines (1,860 answers a month). Growth costs $115 (€99) for 2 brands, 50 prompts, 4 engines, 6 articles and PDF reports. Pro costs $205 (€179) for 3 brands, 100 prompts, 5 engines and 12 articles. Subscriptions taken before 30 November 2026 get 40% off for life, which brings Starter to $27 (€23). Starter and Growth start with a 7-day free trial.

Pros

• A prepared task every day, plus articles, so a small team knows what to ship.
• Perplexity included at no extra cost, among 6 engines.
• AI traffic, crawler logs, site scans and MCP access from the first plan.

Cons

• 20 prompts at entry, against 50 on Peec AI's Starter.
• No tracking of Claude, Grok, DeepSeek or Mistral.
• 1 seat on every plan and 90 days of data history.

The full head-to-head is in Vizible AI vs Peec AI.

2. Otterly.AI

Best for: testing AI visibility on a very small budget, or tracking many brands with simple dashboards.

Otterly.AI is one of the longest-running tools in the category. It tracks ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Microsoft Copilot on every plan, with brand visibility, sentiment, citation sources, a GEO audit of your pages and weekly recommendations. Unlimited team members and unlimited brand reports come with every plan, which makes it easy to share with a wider team.

Pricing: Otterly.AI costs $29 a month for 15 prompts on Lite, $189 for 100 prompts on Standard and $489 for 400 prompts on Premium. Gemini and Google AI Mode cost $9 a month each on Lite and $59 each on Standard; Claude costs $29 on Lite and $109 on Standard. 100 extra prompts cost $99 a month from Standard. A free trial is available.

Pros

• The lowest regular entry price in this list.
• Unlimited team members, brands and countries.
• API access, MCP access and AI agent analytics from Standard.

Cons

• 15 prompts cover only a narrow slice of a market.
• Agent analytics and API access start at $189.
• Gemini, AI Mode and Claude are paid add-ons on every plan.

What users and testers say: Otterly.AI is rated 4.7 out of 5 from 54 reviews on G2, where users praise the quick setup and the clean interface, and criticise reports that are hard to customise and the price jump from Lite to Standard. In Overthink Group's hands-on test, updated in January 2026, it scored 2.8 out of 5: strong control over brand names and domains, but reports that filter by one tag at a time.

See Vizible AI vs Otterly.AI for the detail.

3. SE Visible

Best for: teams that need hundreds of prompts, or that already use SE Ranking for SEO.

SE Visible is the AI visibility tool of SE Ranking, sold separately from the SEO suite. It tracks ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Mode and Google AI Overviews, collects answers through the real interfaces of those engines rather than their APIs, and refreshes every prompt daily. It covers seven countries (the US, the UK, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Spain) in five languages, and lists Claude and brand sentiment analysis as coming soon.

Pricing: SE Visible costs $89 a month for 75 prompts and 5 projects (about 11,250 AI answers a month), $189 for 200 prompts and 10 projects, and $399 for 1,000 prompts and 30 projects, with unlimited users and a 10-day free trial. Annual billing takes 20% off.

Pros

• By far the lowest cost per AI answer in this list.
• Answers collected from the engines' interfaces, as users see them.
• Unlimited users, plus an API that covers what the interface does.

Cons

• No Perplexity and no Copilot.
• Seven countries and five languages only.
• Monitoring first: no content production or daily tasks.

What users and testers say: SE Visible has no reviews yet on G2 or Capterra. Exploding Topics, which belongs to Semrush, likes its sentiment and share-of-voice views for agencies with several domains, and notes that it tracks brand mentions rather than the pages the engines cite.

See Vizible AI vs SE Ranking.

4. Promptwatch

Best for: technical teams whose buyers use Claude, or teams that want every model without choosing.

Promptwatch, based in Amsterdam, tracks the same models on every plan: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Copilot, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Meta's Llama, DeepSeek and Mistral, among others. It adds crawler logs, an agent chat, content gap analysis and AEO articles, and connects to Webflow, Framer, WordPress, Google Search Console and Slack.

Pricing: Promptwatch costs $95 a month for 1 project, 50 prompts and 6,000 responses on Essential, $245 for 2 projects and 150 prompts on Professional, and $579 for 5 projects and 350 prompts on Business. Content writing and refresh start on Professional. Essential and Professional start with a 7-day free trial.

Pros

• Every model on every plan, Claude and DeepSeek included.
• API and MCP access from the first plan.
• Crawler logs and an agent chat included.

Cons

• The same $95 entry price as Peec AI, so no saving at entry.
• Content writing only from $245.
• A rich interface that takes time to learn for a small team.

What users and testers say: Promptwatch is rated 4.6 out of 5 from 21 reviews on G2. Users like the citation tracking, the MCP and API access and the monthly feature releases, and find the interface dense and slow to learn; one reviewer found that credits run out quickly.

See Vizible AI vs Promptwatch.

5. Profound

Best for: large brands with a procurement process, a security review and a budget for a custom contract.

Profound is the enterprise option of the category. Its custom plan tracks up to 9 answer engines, including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Copilot, DeepSeek, Claude, Google AI Overviews and Exa Search, with prompt volume data, AI shopping data, agent analytics, all-time history, exports, an API, SSO and SOC 2 compliance. Its "AI Marketer" agents run research, writing and reporting on credits.

Pricing: Profound has no self-serve paid plan for brands. The free trial runs 50 prompts a day for 7 days on ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews, without history, exports or API. Enterprise is priced on request.

Pros

• The widest engine coverage on its Enterprise plan.
• Security and compliance features that large companies require.
• Prompt volume data to choose prompts by real demand.

Cons

• No public price, so no quick start for a small team.
• The free trial lasts 7 days and keeps no history.
• Built for teams with the time to run a large platform.

What users and testers say: Profound is rated 4.5 out of 5 from more than 1,100 reviews on G2, by far the largest review base in this list. Users praise the dashboards and the support, and call it expensive for smaller companies. Overthink Group gave it the best score of its test, 3.6 out of 5, as the only tool that watched specific URLs for citations, but found its sentiment built on prompts the user did not choose.

6. Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit

Best for: teams that already open Semrush every day and want AI visibility next to their SEO data.

Semrush sells AI visibility as a toolkit on top of its SEO platform. It includes AI visibility reports for any domain, AI competitor analysis, prompt research and a site audit for AI readiness, with mentions from ChatGPT, Google's AI, Gemini and Perplexity.

Pricing: Semrush's AI Visibility Toolkit costs $99 a month per domain, billed annually, for 25 custom prompts tracked daily. Extra users start at $45 a month, and white-label PDF reports need the $20 Pro Report add-on. Semrush offers a 7-day free trial.

Pros

• AI data next to keywords, backlinks and site audits in one account.
• Prompt research built on Semrush's own data.
• Reports any domain, useful for competitor research.

Cons

• 25 prompts per domain for $99, billed annually.
• Extra seats and branded reports cost extra.
• Best value only if you already pay for Semrush.

What users and testers say: the toolkit has no reviews yet on G2. Overthink Group liked its polished reports and head-to-head comparisons but scored it 2.2 out of 5, with little to drill into and noisy AI insights, and Zapier notes that extra users add to the bill.

See Vizible AI vs Semrush.

7. Ahrefs Brand Radar

Best for: Ahrefs customers who want to benchmark a category from a large prompt database before tracking their own prompts.

Ahrefs Brand Radar works in two ways. Its AI Visibility Index maps brands across more than 496 million prompts built from Ahrefs' keyword data, with no setup and history back to 2025. Its custom prompts track the questions you define, as often as daily, on Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Copilot, with Claude available on custom prompts.

Pricing: Ahrefs Brand Radar sells custom prompts from $50 a month, with a few included in every paid Ahrefs plan from Lite, and the AI Visibility Index from $199 a month, or $699 a month for all models. Custom prompts are counted in checks: one prompt on one platform for a month uses about 30 checks, and Claude uses 8 checks per update.

Pros

• The largest prompt database to benchmark a whole market.
• Visibility weighted by real search volume.
• Claude available on custom prompts.

Cons

• Two products and a check-based count that take time to budget.
• The index works best for brands that already have search demand.
• Best value only for existing Ahrefs customers.

What users and testers say: TechRadar's review finds Brand Radar useful for digging into individual answers and competitor clues, but notes that the full index costs $699 a month and that estimated impressions are not real reach. Overthink Group scored it 1.1 out of 5, mostly for lagging data and thin coverage.

8. Searchable

Best for: content teams that publish a lot and want articles produced from their AI visibility gaps.

Searchable combines tracking, site audits and content production. ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews and Perplexity are included; Claude, Copilot, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Grok, DeepSeek and Meta Muse are paid add-ons. Agent analytics, AI shopping data, MCP and unlimited seats come with every plan.

Pricing: Searchable costs $125 a month for 100 prompts per model, 9,000 AI answers and 20 articles on Pro, and $400 for 500 prompts, 80 articles, Looker Studio, white-label reports and API access on Scale. Both start with a 14-day free trial.

Pros

• 20 articles a month from the first plan.
• Unlimited seats and projects.
• 12 months of data history on Pro, unlimited above.

Cons

• Nearly three times Vizible AI's entry price.
• Only 3 engines included; the others are add-ons.
• White-label reports and API only from $400.

What users and testers say: Searchable is rated 4.8 out of 5 from 104 reviews on G2, where users find it easy for non-technical teams and like audits that come with fixes, but 3.8 out of 5 from 17 reviews on Trustpilot, where recent complaints concern the content editor and billing after cancellation.

See Vizible AI vs Searchable.

9. Qwairy

Best for: French and European teams that want many engines and EU data hosting.

Qwairy, made in France, covers about a dozen engines through their interfaces on every plan, including ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Claude, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Perplexity, Copilot, Grok and Meta AI. It adds sentiment, perception, an action center, content opportunities, a content studio, Google Search Console and Bing Webmaster Tools data, and an MCP server. Data is hosted in the EU.

Pricing: Qwairy costs €79 a month excluding VAT for 1 workspace and 2,500 credits, €199 for 2 workspaces and 10,000 credits, and €449 for 5 workspaces and 30,000 credits, with AI crawler analytics and Looker Studio on that top plan. One credit covers one prompt on one engine for one run, so 2,500 credits cover about 27 prompts a day on 3 engines, or about 190 prompts checked weekly.

Pros

• About a dozen engines on every plan, Claude and Grok included.
• Weekly or monthly tracking to stretch the same credits.
• EU hosting, GDPR alignment and unlimited team members.

Cons

• Credits take a calculation before you know your real prompt count.
• Crawler analytics only on the €449 plan.
• No daily task: you turn the recommendations into work yourself.

What users and testers say: Qwairy is rated 4.7 out of 5 from 51 reviews on G2. Users praise the quick onboarding, the support and the wide engine coverage, and find the interface dense; premium engines also use more credits.

See Vizible AI vs Qwairy.

10. Meteoria

Best for: French teams that want unlimited seats, brands and countries at a fixed price.

Meteoria, also French, asks 3 engines chosen among ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Grok, Google AI Mode and Copilot, with sentiment analysis and integrations with Google Analytics and Matomo. Seats, countries, projects and brands are unlimited on every plan.

Pricing: Meteoria costs €75 a month for 25 prompts, €175 for 100 prompts with AI-friendly content, and €420 for 300 prompts with a risk report, AI log analysis and Looker Studio, with a free trial and two months free on annual plans.

Pros

• Unlimited seats, countries, projects and brands.
• Grok available among the engines.
• Matomo integration for teams that avoid Google Analytics.

Cons

• 3 engines on every plan.
• AI log analysis only on the €420 plan.
• Content features start at €175.

What users and testers say: Meteoria has no reviews yet on G2, Capterra or Trustpilot, so independent feedback is thin. HubSpot's French blog, which promotes its own tool in the same article, calls it a reference for large and mid-sized French companies and points to the limit of 3 engines at a time.

See Vizible AI vs Meteoria.

11. Scrunch AI

Best for: mid-sized and enterprise teams that want AI visibility, AI bot traffic and site fixes in one tool.

Scrunch AI tracks prompts on ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Microsoft Copilot on its first plans, with citations and sources, sentiment, funnel stages, AI bot traffic, site audits and page optimisations. Its Enterprise plan adds Claude, Gemini, Meta AI, Google AI Mode and Grok, API access and the Agent Experience Platform, which serves a version of your pages built for AI agents.

Pricing: Scrunch AI costs $250 a month on Core for 125 prompts, 5,000 AI responses a month, 1 brand, 1 country and 5 users, with a 7-day free trial. Enterprise is quoted on demand.

Pros

• AI bot traffic and site audits on the first plan.
• 125 prompts and 5 users at entry.
• A clear path to enterprise features, including the Agent Experience Platform.

Cons

• Gemini, Google AI Mode and Claude only on Enterprise.
• At $250, more than five times Vizible AI's entry price.
• 1 country and 1 language on Core.

What users and testers say: Scrunch AI is rated 4.6 out of 5 from 74 reviews on G2. Users like the interface, the citation data and the tracking of AI referral traffic, and some find the four-week baseline slow and the contract terms rigid. Overthink Group scored it 3.4 out of 5: the best segmentation of its test, with shallow drill-down.

12. AthenaHQ

Best for: teams that want to start free and need many engines, Claude, Grok and DeepSeek included.

AthenaHQ counts usage in credits, one credit per AI answer. Its free Essential plan includes 300 credits on ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Copilot, with unlimited users, competitor and source insights and content recommendations. Starter adds Google AI Mode, Claude, Grok, DeepSeek, Meta AI and Mistral, unlimited topics and prompts, country-level tracking and a content optimisation agent.

Pricing: AthenaHQ is free on Essential, with 300 credits, then costs $295 a month on Starter for 3,600 credits, which covers about 40 prompts a day on 3 engines by our calculation. Annual billing takes 17% off. API access and extra credits are paid add-ons, and Enterprise is quoted on demand.

Pros

• A free plan to try before paying.
• 11 models on Starter, Claude and Grok included.
• Unlimited prompts and users: credits set the volume.

Cons

• A big jump from free to $295 a month.
• API access and extra credits cost more.
• Credits need a calculation before you know your real prompt count.

What users and testers say: AthenaHQ is rated 4.9 out of 5 from 39 reviews on G2, the highest score in this list. Users praise the Action Center and the gap analysis, and mention a steep learning curve and several days of work to set up the prompt library.

13. Writesonic

Best for: content teams that want AI visibility tracking bundled with an AI writer and SEO audits.

Writesonic started as an AI writing tool and now sells AI visibility tracking inside its content platform. Its Starter plan tracks 50 prompts daily on ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews, with ads monitoring, 15 AI articles a month and 10 site audits; sentiment analysis starts on Growth, and the full Action Center and all 9 AI platforms come with Enterprise.

Pricing: Writesonic costs $99 a month on Starter, or $79 a month billed annually, for 50 prompts, 15 articles, 1 user and 1 project. Basic costs $199 a month and Growth $399 a month, both billed annually, for 100 and 200 prompts. A free trial is available.

Pros

• AI articles and site audits in the same plan.
• 50 prompts on the first plan.
• A long track record as a content platform.

Cons

• No Perplexity or Copilot before Enterprise.
• Sentiment analysis only from Growth.
• 1 user on Starter.

What users and testers say: Writesonic is rated 4.7 out of 5 on G2 across more than 2,200 reviews, but most of them cover its writing tool rather than AI visibility tracking. NoGood's review finds the AI visibility insights lighter than those of dedicated trackers, with weak citation monitoring.

How much do Peec AI alternatives cost?

Entry prices for paid self-serve plans range from $27 (Vizible AI's launch offer) to $295 a month (AthenaHQ's Starter), but tools count volume in prompts, credits, checks or answers, so the entry price alone misleads. The fairest comparison is the cost per 1,000 AI answers on each entry plan, using the vendor's own answer count when it gives one. Figures marked "our calculation" multiply prompts by engines by 30 days.

Semrush, Ahrefs and Profound are not in this table because their volume is not counted in a comparable way.

The cheapest tool per AI answer is rarely the cheapest tool to run: count what you will do with the answers, not only how many you get.

Two things change the picture. Cost per answer falls as plans grow: Vizible AI's Pro plan works out to about $13 per 1,000 answers, against about $16 on Peec AI's Advanced plan. And the price of the work matters more than the price of the data. A plan that includes articles, a daily task and crawler analysis saves the hours a small team would otherwise spend turning a dashboard into a to-do list.

How to switch from Peec AI without losing your baseline

Run both tools side by side for two weeks on the same prompts, the same engines and the same country, then compare the mention rate, not each vendor's score. Every tool builds its visibility score its own way, so a 42 in one dashboard and a 31 in another can describe the same reality.

The parallel run matters because AI answers vary from one run to the next. When SparkToro and Gumshoe.ai had 600 volunteers run about 3,000 prompts, the odds of getting the same brand list twice were under 1 in 100. A few days of data in one tool against months in another will show differences that are only noise, which is why AI visibility has to be read as a distribution rather than a single number.

Copy your Peec prompt list as it is, keep branded and non-branded prompts in separate groups as explained in branded vs non-branded AI Share of Voice, and add new prompts only after the comparison. Last check before you switch: Peec gives 15% off for annual billing, so compare prices on the billing period you will actually pay.

How to choose the right Peec AI alternative

Start from the reason you are leaving Peec AI, then pick the tool built for it.

• You want to know what to do every day: Vizible AI, with a daily task, articles and site scans included.
• You need the lowest possible monthly bill: Otterly.AI at $29, or Vizible AI at $27 until 30 November 2026.
• You need hundreds of prompts: SE Visible.
• Your buyers use Claude: Promptwatch, or Qwairy on a euro budget.
• You already pay for an SEO suite: Semrush's toolkit or Ahrefs Brand Radar.
• You publish a lot of content: Searchable, or Writesonic if you also want an AI writer.
• You need security reviews, SSO and a custom contract: Profound.
• You want to start free with many engines, Claude included: AthenaHQ's free plan, then $295 a month.
• You want AI bot traffic and site fixes next to tracking: Scrunch AI.

Whatever you choose, tracking is only the first step. Once you know where you stand, the work is on the pages and sources the engines read; our guide to the 7 GEO levers to improve AI visibility explains where to start.